1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    And there has already been another one. This one in Kansas. It appears to be "workplace violence." Details are sketch but reports are somewhere between 4 and 7 dead and more than 20 wounded.
     
  2. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,451
    So what color was the guy in Kansas???:meh:
     
  3. 69magpie

    69magpie Mischievous Magpie

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2014
    Messages:
    19,107
    Going on from what Stumbler wrote that you highlighted .... The Kansas shooting did become a news piece therefore there's an excellent chance the gunman is a ???? male.

    I'll let you figure out what word the question marks should be.
     
  4. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,451
    Are you claiming the shooting in Kalamazoo did not make the news or was somehow under reported compared to the shooting in Kansas???

    Because the Kalamazoo shooting has by far been covered more than the Kansas shooting...

    Are you trying to be more like Stumbler????
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. 69magpie
      If I did then how did I know about the Kalamazoo shooting.

      The answer is... No.
       
      69magpie, Feb 26, 2016
    3. CS natureboy
      I suppose you found out the same way you found out about the Kansas shooting.... There is not a thread dedicated to either one on this site....

      You tell me????
       
      CS natureboy, Feb 26, 2016
    4. 69magpie
      My answer to your previous question was No........as I posted.
       
      69magpie, Feb 26, 2016
    5. CS natureboy
      Well then, what was your point again???
       
      CS natureboy, Feb 26, 2016
    6. 69magpie
      I've forgotten and now I'm just as confused as you. :D
       
      69magpie, Feb 26, 2016
  5. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,451
    Anti-Gun Ex-State Senator Sentenced for What Else? Gun Trafficking
    by Matt Strong | 5:27 pm, February 24th, 2016


    Former California State Senator Leland Yee was sentenced to five years in prison by a federal district judge on Tuesday for his role in a complex case of political corruption. He was also fined $20,000.

    The 67-year-old pleaded guilty last July to racketeering charges in connection with two criminal enterprises related to soliciting bribes and smuggling guns. Lee also admitted to receiving more than $40,000 in bribes for political favors. Specifically, he promised an undercover FBI agent quid pro quo favors in return for campaign contributions.

    While prosecutors sought eight years for the San Francisco Democrat, his defense team was able to work out a deal closer to their initial goal of four years and three months citing the poor health of Lee’s wife and his several years of public service.

    U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who sentenced Yee, explicitly remarked on the former Senator’s betrayal of public trust as an elected official: “I don’t feel I can be lenient. The crimes you have committed were essentially an attack on a democratic institution.”

    A repentent Lee responded to Breyer, “I have taken full responsibility for my actions. I have accepted and understand the crimes I have committed.”

    Prior to his March 2014 arrest, Yee, an advocate of gun control, represented the western half of San Francisco and the majority of San Mateo County.
     
  6. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Only a leftist can say it with such conviction and ring;

    [​IMG]

    Then we have a formal apology;

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    GunFAIL CLXXVI

    BY David Waldman

    Look it up on Daily Kos
     
  8. mischling

    mischling Sex Lover

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Messages:
    164
    A question, please, and i'm being honest, it's not intended to be a "loaded question."

    i can perfectly understand how some people can feel the need to own guns for defense against crime (if i prefer other methods, like those we have here in most of Europe, but it's OK, not relevant to the question.)

    But if i'm not wrong, the famed 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the "deep" argument for gun rights is not so much about fighting crime, but about fighting tyrannical governments, foreign invasions, rebellions and the like (correct me if i'm wrong, please.)

    i'm sure that was very intelligent and appropriate when this Amendment was passed, in the late 18th century. Hell, after all, here in Spain we fought off Napoleon and his cronies in the early 19th century using basically knifes and improvised weaponry, popularizing the word "guerrilla" and "guerrillero/a" (which are Spanish as you'll sure know) in the process: the Peninsular War, which is called the Independence War here. (Unfortunately the rulers who came after Napoleon's cronies had been defeated were WAY worse, as in the Felon King, but that's a different history: the fact is that it worked big time.)

    But back then, the technological and resources difference between tyrannical armies and guerrilleros were not very huge. At the end of the day, it was basically a guy with a musket and a sabre against a guy with a blunderbuss and a really nasty navaja de siete muelles. As the guerrilleros fighted, technological advances of that time like field artillery were rendered useless. So it was essentially a man-vs-man fight which could be won.

    On the opposite, today that difference is huge as hell. Groups of armed citizens fighting as guerrilleros, even if allowed to own things like actual heavy machine guns and bazookas (which i think is not the case anywhere in the world), are simply not a match for modern armies fighting on the side of tyranny. Yes, sure they can do some damage, but nothing really serious if the tyrannical army is ready to use its whole force against the people (or the fraction of people opposing them, civil wars often ensue.) i think you can't fight modern advanced tanks, warplanes, drones, missiles, satellites, warships, submarines, reconnaissance, surveillance, intelligence and all that stuff with basic guns. Sure you can be a pain in the ass for some time, but eventually you're lost if another equally modern, advanced army doesn't arrive to do the fighting for you (and that's how it actually was in our Independence War BTW: in the end, the British helped us a lot against the French. Actually, almost every triumphant guerrilla has had the help or support of some power, usually foreign.)

    Am i wrong, please? Do you honestly think that an armed society can stand a fight against an advanced, 21st-century tyrannical army, especially if it is their own country's army? And if so, how?
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2016
  9. deleted user 777 698

    deleted user 777 698 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    8,747
    Perhaps I can shed some light on the reason why American's prefer to have the right to be armed. Did you know the NRA had it's beginnings fighting for a black mans right to own firearms. It was the white democrats that wanted to deny the black man the right to defend himself from white democrats hiding under bed sheets in order to lynch black men without due process. Does that clear up things for you? In the south GOVERNMENT leaders were part of the KKK that lynched black men, why do you think the cowards hid under bed sheets?

    Guns are a tool to defend yourself from evil people. For instance imagine if one of the French citizens that were slaughtered by Muslim extremists in Paris had been armed. That citizen would most likely be alive today, and maybe a lot others. Always be wary of anyone trying to disarm you. The German regime killed 11 million German citizens merely because they were Jewish. Imagine if those 11 million people were armed. Perhaps that dark time in history would have never happened.

    How do we know this fellow Stumbler is not a Muslim terrorist working to disarm the public in the US to make their terrorist attacks more deadly? It is VERY possible. Do not think for one moment Muslim terrorist organizations have not planned how to disarm their enemies. More now than ever Americans have to be vigilant. So why would you want to disarm them. Ask yourself who fears guns the most? EVIL people fear guns. Honest people don't. Do not fall prey to evil people that want to take from you your right to defend yourself. Remember ONLY evil men fear guns.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2016
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Man accidentally shoots self on scooter ride to liquor store — but makes up wild shootout tale instead

    Look it up on RawStory
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,071
    Mike Royko, a columnist for the Chicago Tribune used to have a satirical "Gun Owner of the Year Award." He liked to say, "As usual the competition was very fierce, almost as fierce as the gun owners themselves."

    One year the award went to a man who had shot his penis off. He would go to sleep at night with a hand gun under his pillow. One night he thought someone was at the foot of his bed, so he aimed and fired, but he did not aim carefully enough.
     
    1. acook02
      Why are all gun owners lumped in with the idiots by liberals? I'll say it again. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
       
      acook02, Mar 3, 2016
  12. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,071
    I think it is more possible that you're an armed robber who agrees with the NRA that he needs a gun to protect himself from the government.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. Distant Lover
      Thank you MissRachael. I think you are a real cutie, by the way. :)
       
      Distant Lover, Mar 3, 2016
      MissRachael likes this.
    2. MissRachael
      I keep trying to stay away from this thread but it is just so damned funny!
       
      MissRachael, Mar 3, 2016
      kydave and Distant Lover like this.
    3. acook02
      The second amendment is not, and has never been about hunting. It is about protection, both from criminals and a tyrannical government. I suggest you read your Constitution, and follow that up with the Federalist Papers.
       
      acook02, Mar 7, 2016
  13. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,451
    *not_secure_link*1.bp.blogspot.com/-CVtg6cvOvrg/UWChFfnwKaI/AAAAAAAAFCI/bK-m6jf71Sc/s640/black-gun.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,071
    TAXATION NO TYRANNY: AN ANSWER TO THE RESOLUTIONS AND ADDRESS OF THE AMERICAN CONGRESS, by Samuel Johnson

    We are told, that the subjection of Americans may tend to the diminution of our own liberties; an event, which none but very perspicacious politicians are able to foresee. If slavery be thus fatally contagious, how is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?
    *not_secure_link*www.samueljohnson.com/tnt.html

    ---------

    With this passage, "He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us," the Declaration of Independence complained about the fact that the British Army was helping slaves break the chains of American bondage.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. MissRachael
      Oh the scandalous British!!
       
      MissRachael, Mar 3, 2016
      Viewer1060 and Distant Lover like this.
    2. Distant Lover
       
      Distant Lover, Mar 3, 2016
      MissRachael likes this.
    3. Distant Lover
      Rule Britannia

      When Britain first, at Heaven's command
      Arose from out the azure main;
      This was the charter of the land,
      And guardian angels sang this strain:
      "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
      "Britons never will be slaves."

      The nations, not so blest as thee,
      Must, in their turns, to tyrants fall;
      While thou shalt flourish great and free,
      The dread and envy of them all.
      "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
      "Britons never will be slaves."

      Still more majestic shalt thou rise,
      More dreadful, from each foreign stroke;A
      As the loud blast that tears the skies,
      Serves but to root thy native oak.
      "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
      "Britons never will be slaves."
       
      Distant Lover, Mar 3, 2016
      MissRachael likes this.
    4. tenguy
      Now you are telling us that the Revolutionary War was over slavery????? How fucking stupid is this???

      The Master of Farce is at it again, revisionist extraordinaire.
       
      tenguy, Mar 3, 2016
      Viewer1060 likes this.
    5. Distant Lover
      During the Revolutionary War slavery was legal in each of the rebellious colonies. It was illegal in England.

      --------

      Lord Dunmore's Proclamation

      By His Excellency the Right Honorable JOHN Earl of DUNMORE, His Majesty's Lieutenant and Governor General of the Colony and Dominion of VIRGINIA, and Vice Admiral of the same...

      I do hereby further declare all indented Servants, Negroes, or others, (appertaining to Rebels,) free that are able and willing to bear Arms, they joining His MAJESTY'S Troops as soon as may be, foe the more speedily reducing this Colony to a proper Sense of their Duty, to His MAJESTY'S Crown and Dignity...

      GIVEN under my Hand on board the Ship WILLIAM by Norfolk, the 7th Day of November in the SIXTEENTH Year of His MAJESTY'S Reign.
      *not_secure_link*www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/active_learning/explorations/revolution/dunsmore.cfm
       
      Distant Lover, Mar 4, 2016
      MissRachael likes this.
  15. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,071
    Thee haughty tyrants ne'er shall tame:
    All their attempts to bend thee down,
    Will but arouse thy generous flame;
    But work their woe, and thy renown.
    "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
    "Britons never will be slaves."

    To thee belongs the rural reign;
    Thy cities shall with commerce shine:
    All thine shall be the subject main,
    And every shore it circles thine.
    "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
    "Britons never will be slaves."

    The Muses, still with freedom found,
    Shall to thy happy coast repair;
    Blest Isle! With matchless beauty crown'd,
    And manly hearts to guard the fair.
    "Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
    "Britons never will be slaves."
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. shadow walker

    shadow walker Полковник

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Messages:
    5,852
    10888878_10152561636356701_7462119073466779374_n.jpg 12321148_10153080881091601_3457871365250359382_n.jpg Pickle gun.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. MissRachael

    MissRachael Don't Let The Blonde Hair Fool You! In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2012
    Messages:
    9,341
    • Like Like x 1
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Another man dead after shooting himself while trying to take a gun-toting selfie

    Look it up on RawStory
     
    • Like Like x 3
    1. Viewer1060
      On a distant corner of the web is Darwin Moment when those with IQ less than room temperature die.
       
      Viewer1060, Mar 13, 2016
  19. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    62,071
    During the Revolutionary War slavery was legal in each of the rebellious colonies. It was illegal in England.

    --------

    Lord Dunmore's Proclamation

    By His Excellency the Right Honorable JOHN Earl of DUNMORE, His Majesty's Lieutenant and Governor General of the Colony and Dominion of VIRGINIA, and Vice Admiral of the same...

    I do hereby further declare all indented Servants, Negroes, or others, (appertaining to Rebels,) free that are able and willing to bear Arms, they joining His MAJESTY'S Troops as soon as may be, foe the more speedily reducing this Colony to a proper Sense of their Duty, to His MAJESTY'S Crown and Dignity...

    GIVEN under my Hand on board the Ship WILLIAM by Norfolk, the 7th Day of November in the SIXTEENTH Year of His MAJESTY'S Reign.
    *not_secure_link*www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/active_learning/explorations/revolution/dunsmore.cfm
     
    1. Distant Lover
      I posted this further up as a comment to an insult by tenguy.

      I want to draw attention to it - not the insult, which does not merit consideration, but to my comment itself.
       
      Distant Lover, Mar 4, 2016
      MissRachael likes this.
    2. shootersa
      You know Dog, you keep reminding me of Donald Trump.
      Huge ego, illogical thought process, "facts" that are unsupported.
      Have you considered running for President?
       
      shootersa, Mar 5, 2016
  20. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    27,451
    Keanu Reeves shooting in a three gun competition...